Some athletes ditch processed foods for the real deal

From the Chicago Tribune.

When sports physiologist Allen Lim flew to Europe six years ago to work with America’s top pro cyclists, he saw a lot of problems in the peloton. Riders complained about the diet of packaged bars, gels, chews and sugary sports drinks that fueled them through races like the Tour de France, and many were experiencing stomachaches, diarrhea and bloating.

“I started seeing that when I used the products given to us by sponsors, I didn’t see the performances that the products were claiming,” says Lim. In a radical departure from what pro athletes are used to, he steered riders away from engineered foods and focused on feeding them fresh, whole ingredients, on and off the bike.

“Our bodies are used to sitting down and having a meal with friends and family, cutting up the food, chewing and slowly digesting over the evening with a great glass of wine,” says Lim, director of sports science and training for the RadioShack pro cycling team, former home to Lance Armstrong.

“We’re not used to tearing open a foil package with a deconstructed blob of goo and sucking it down while racing bikes at 30 mph. Sports companies are constantly deconstructing foods to the point where people are eating some key elements of food, not the whole food.” Lim says.

Read the rest here.

"

People ask me: Why do you write about food, and eating and drinking? Why don’t you write about the struggle for power and security, and about love, the way others do?

They ask it accusingly, as if I were somehow gross, unfaithful to the honor of my craft.

The easiest answer is to say that, like most other humans, I am hungry. But there is more than that. It seems to me that our three basic needs, for food and security and love, are so mixed and mingled and entwined that we cannot straightly think of one without the others. So it happens that when I write of hunger, I am really writing about love and the hunger for it, and warmth and the love of it and the hunger for it… and then the warmth and richness and fine reality of hunger satisfied…and it is all one.

"

— M.F.K. Fisher, The Gastronomical Me

What does “sustainability” mean, anyway?

From an article in the East Bay Express.

Chefs in the progressive Bay Area are, not surprisingly, keen on the concept of sustainability. But even they have differing opinions on what exactly it means and how to best employ it in their restaurants.

For Gather’s Sean Baker, it’s about “cooking with respect and care” and using “ingredients that were raised with respect and care.” In his kitchen, “we throw almost nothing away.”

Baker one-ups other chefs who boast of using the whole animal by using the whole fruit and vegetable. “People normally throw away peels, seeds, and tops,” he said. “We don’t.”

Take watermelon: Baker pickles its rind, feeds its peel through a Champion juicer to mix with green tea and create gels, and sears its flesh to use in dishes.

Carrot peelings are transformed into ash, destined for carrot-ash vinaigrette. Cornhusks, cobs, and tomato ends are toasted, grilled, charred, and pressure-cooked for stock. Deep-fried cornsilk is a lacy garnish.

“I can’t save every single beet top, though I wish I could,” said Baker. “It takes more work to cook sustainably than not to cook sustainably.”

Gather’s popular kale salad “blows through a hundred pounds of kale a week and produces enough kale stems to fill huge compost bins,” Baker explained. “So I sat down with a notepad trying to think of how to use kale stems.”

Solution: Pressure-cook them, braise them in puttanesca broth, then serve them with melted burrata on toast.

When dining at restaurants not his own, Baker has a keen eye for pseudo-sustainability. “I can tell when they’re using non-organic broccoli rabe. I can look at a menu and know for sure whether they’re really using the whole animal or not. I don’t make a scene, but I know.

“I have a huge problem with people who don’t walk the walk.”

Read the rest here.

"The basis of their diet, therefore, is white bread and margarine, corned beef, sugared tea, and potatoes — an appalling diet. Would it not be better if they spent more money on wholesome things like oranges and wholemeal bread or if they even, like the writer of the letter to the New Statesman, saved on fuel and ate their carrots raw? Yes, it would, but the point is that no ordinary human being is ever going to do such a thing. The ordinary human being would sooner starve than live on brown bread and raw carrots. And the peculiar evil is this, that the less money you have, the less inclined you feel to spend it on wholesome food. A millionaire may enjoy breakfasting off orange juice and Ryvita biscuits; an unemployed man doesn’t. Here the tendency of which I spoke at the end of the last chapter comes into play. When you are unemployed, which is to say when you are underfed, harassed, bored, and miserable, you don’t want to eat dull wholesome food. You want something a little bit ‘tasty’. There is always some cheaply pleasant thing to tempt you. Let’s have three pennorth of chips! Run out and buy us a twopenny ice-cream! Put the kettle on and we’ll all have a nice cup of tea! That is how your mind works when you are at the P.A.C. [Public Assistance Committee; welfare] level. White bread-and-marg and sugared tea don’t nourish you to any extent, but they are nicer (at least most people think so) than brown bread-and-dripping and cold water. Unemployment is an endless misery that has got to be constantly palliated, and especially with tea, the English-man’s opium. A cup of tea or even an aspirin is much better as a temporary stimulant than a crust of brown bread."

The Road to Wigan Pier, by George Orwell

About the Community Market Farms Program

Our Community Market Farms Program takes vacant or underutilized land and transforms it into market farms.  All the food produced on the farms is distributed on a donation-only basis at our Saturday farm stand.  In an area where access to healthy foods is limited, it is our farms that make it possible for many families to eat fresh vegetables rather than processed foods.  The program creates sustainable food systems that provide affordable, nutritious food directly to traditionally underserved populations in West Oakland. We collect food scraps from local businesses each week using our bicycle carts. These scraps, combined with donated sawdust and manure, are used to create compost that builds soil to support year-round growing. We also operate a greenhouse that supplies our market farms, Backyard Gardeners, and the public with plants and seedlings.  City Slicker Farms has created a truly local food cycle with residents contributing vegetable scraps for compost that is used to grow vegetables that are then distributed back to the community.  All our culturally appropriate, nutrient-dense, seasonal vegetables and fruits, eggs and honey are marketed and distributed to West Oakland residents at our weekly farm stand.  Everything is distributed on a donation-only basis to ensure that all residents are able to afford health-promoting foods, and no one is turned away due to a lack of funds.  

Greetings and salutations!

Listed below is a self-guided anti-oppression text and video tour for our staff and allies. Please follow the self-guided tour for a holistic overview or pick and choose from the topics listed below. The basic outline takes one through West Oakland, the work and mission of People’s Grocery as a community-based empowerement organization in West Oakland, youth empowerment, principles of environmental justice and the Black Panther Party 10-point platform, anti-racism and the role of the white ally in communities of color, and understanding white supremacy and institutional racism.

This is a lot to take in, please read and reread carefully. Follow up resources and additional texts can be found in section 11 and 12. People’s Grocery uses food as a vehicle for social justice and empowerment, it is not just food- It’s FOOD JUSTICE- HEALTHY FOOD FOR EVERYONE!

Google’s new Recipe Search: “the new winners are recipes packaged for the American eating and cooking disorder”

When searching for recipes, I still use plain old Google search. Yes, it returns a fair bit of chaff, but I feel like it allows a bit more serendipity than the new Recipe Search seems to.

From an essay by Amanda Hesser on food52.

The entity with the greatest influence on what Americans cook is not Costco or Trader Joe’s. It’s not the Food Network or The New York Times. It’s Google. Every month about a billion of its searches are for recipes. The dishes that its search engine turns up, particularly those on the first page of results, have a huge impact on what Americans cook. Which is why, with a recent change in its recipe search, Google has, in effect, taken sides in the food war. Unfortunately, it’s taken the wrong one.

Google must surely know that recipes are anything but precise formulas: they’re descriptive guides, and quality cannot be quantified in calories or time. The search engine’s real opportunity lies in understanding the metrics that actually reflect great quality. A very simple place to start is by tracking the number of comments relative to pageviews, the number of Facebook likes a recipe has garnered, or how often a recipe has been shared. A recipe with 74 comments is almost certainly better than one that takes 8 minutes to make. (And at some point, Google should create its own system for calculating calories.)

I’m glad Google put effort into improving its recipe search, but their solution feels robotic rather than thoughtful. If they don’t change their current approach, I fear to contemplate the future of American cooking. As it stands, Google’s recipe search gives undue advantage to the “quick & easy” recipe sites, encourages dishonesty, and sets up people to be dissuaded from cooking, as they will soon learn that recipes always end up taking more time than they expected. Alas, the search algorithm fundamentally misunderstands what recipe searchers are really looking for: great recipes.

(Source: food52.com)

(Source: journalady)

SF chef adds a new twist to CSAs

From an article on SFGate.

Crates of farm-fresh produce sit stacked in Namu restaurant in S.F., which sells the produce to support local agriculture.

On Sunday mornings, customers file into San Francisco’s Namu restaurant for a Korean-inspired brunch.

For some, however, the kimchi fried rice and sizzling okonomiyaki are merely an afterthought. The real reason for the visit is to pick up one of the produce-filled crates that line the bay windows out front.

The boxes are part of chef and co-owner Dennis Lee’s Community Supported Agriculture program, launched just two months ago as an alternative to the more traditional farm-to-consumer, subscription-style CSAs.

Filled with manageable amounts of vegetables and fruit for both individuals and families, the program also provides a direct line to the chef. It’s about more than just getting ingredients for dinner.

“The aspect of supporting and building a community around food is really important to me,” says Lee, who grew up in restaurants and has long been a proponent of supporting small farms.

To that end, Lee tried plenty of CSAs for his own family but always found problems with them. Most notably, he says, was the lack of variety and copious amounts of certain fruits and vegetables, which would inevitably go to waste.

“Even a big family doesn’t eat five bunches of radishes in a week,” says Lee.

Plus, having to subscribe to a weekly or biweekly service doesn’t make sense for every busy family.

A connection to County Line Harvest, a Petaluma farm, gave him the idea to start his own program.

“They were doing these rogue markets week to week, selling out of restaurants,” he says. “They did it here for a few weeks and got a good response.” So good, in fact, that when County Line stopped the market, customers protested.

Lee says he mulled it over and decided to take matters into his own hands.

“I’m at every market all the time anyway,” says Lee. “I figured, ‘Why not buy the extra stuff and create the boxes myself?’ “

It may be more work than he bargained for - Lee admits this is more of a service than a profitable venture right now. But he says he’s not out to build a brand.

His program allows customers to order a box up to about 36 hours before pickup. For $3 more, no advance orders are required; just walk in on a Sunday morning and purchase one, until they’re gone. No need to commit to a weekly service.

A preordered small box, for one to two people, costs $15; a large box, feeding three to four, is $25.

Because the boxes are made up of produce from several farms, the selection can be relatively broad.

The produce is coming from County Line, Star Route, Torosian Farms, Dirty Girl and others, says Lee. A recent crate contained German butterball potatoes, Little Gem lettuce, shiitake mushrooms and lemongrass, among other items.

Because of Lee’s Asian background, customers might wind up with things they wouldn’t otherwise select. What may be a turnoff to some - what to do with those sheets of kombu? - Lee sees as an opportunity for teaching.

“It’s really important for me to educate people beyond what they’re normally exposed to,” says Lee, who, in addition to the kombu, or Japanese seaweed, might include daikon or shungiku, a fragrant Asian green.

A weekly e-mail from Lee accompanies the box, instructing consumers on how to best use their produce.

“I don’t really give recipes,” he says, “but I’ll tell them what to do with each vegetable.” For last week’s lemongrass, for example, he wrote, “Chop this up and make tea or add to soup. Add to your galbi marinade and marinate fish.”

“I think it gives people a sense of accomplishment when they can manipulate the product themselves,” Lee says. And he wants to know how it all ends up. At the conclusion of the e-mail - a request: “Please send me pictures of the stuff that you guys cook!”

On any given week, customers who order the CSA can also supplement their vegetables by purchasing ready-to-cook proteins, like chicken wings in a Thai-style marinade, seasoned hamburger patties and miso-marinated fish.

“I always thought that was a problem with other CSA programs,” Lee says. “What if you want protein? If you have to go to the store to buy that anyway, why not just get the produce you need, too?”

To round out a meal, pints of pickled vegetables and Korean chile hot sauce are available for purchase inside the restaurant.

The best part? While you’re there, you can sit down and have some killer kimchi fried rice.

Of course, the concern about “what if you want protein” is misguided and misleading. I wish people wouldn’t phrase it in terms of “protein” when what they mean is “what if I want meat?”

Earning a living growing food in other people’s back yards

My husband and I took a class in SPIN farming this weekend and thought it was fantastic. Informative, inspiring, and very practically oriented.

Wally and Gail harvesting a backyard crop

I didn’t set out to make a living by farming less than an acre of land inside a city. But that’s what my wife, Gail V., and I do full-time.

Unlike other farmers, when I jump into my truck to inspect my crops, I don’t bump down backroads and dirt trails. My crop tour takes me through the back alleys of Saskatoon’s inner-city neighborhoods. And unlike the huge, monochromatic blocks of golden wheat and tasseled cornstalks that define America’s heartland, my farm is a patchwork of 25 different backyard plots that I don’t own, and that add up to well under an acre.…

My notions about farming were getting spun around and turned on their head. Could it possibly be better to farm in the city than in the country? I decided to go to my spreadsheets and crunch some numbers. I found I could earn a greater profit on much less than an acre in the city than I could on a full acre on the farm—especially if I’d had a bad crop year on the farm.

Seed, fuel, oil, equipment repair—they’re obviously all part of farm costs. I grossed around $25,000 on 10 to 15 acres on the farm, but operating expenses (not including capital expenditures and debt service) approached $10,000. In the city, I could gross between $30,000 and $40,000 on less than an acre, and costs were under $5,000.…

Some of the people we lease from are landlords who rent their houses to tenants. The landlords are so happy not to maintain the yards that they give them to us for free. We use water from their outdoor faucets, but their bill is far less than they would pay to maintain the yard.

When we do pay a rental fee, it’s either a combination of cash and produce, or just cash. Usually, home owners are at work when we’re working at their place several times a week. When the owners are at home, they enjoy coming out to chat.

He Grows Crops in Other People's Backyards

With careful calculations, we decide when to grow what crops. In some yards, we grow three or more crops sequentially each season. In others, we grow one or two crops. By balancing high-value with low-value crops, we produce a steady stream of revenue from May until Christmas.…

When I was in college, I studied sociology. Ironically, that may have helped lead me to farming—many of the classes emphasized workplace alienation, something that made me want to be my own boss. As a farmer, I like making my own decisions and having control of my work.

He Grows Crops in Other People's Backyards

Sociology may have instilled in me something else: A desire to make a difference in the world. I believe small plot, organic-intensive farming—whether in the city or country—can do that. During the winter, I spend time writing about what I’ve learned so it can be shared with others.

I have an Internet newsletter and chat room dedicated to the subject. I’ve also cowritten guides with urban agriculture advocate Roxanne Christensen of Philadelphia. This winter, my wife and I are planning to speak at a workshop designed to help elderly immigrants earn money by growing crops in backyards and selling produce at farmers’ markets.

Read the rest here.